U.S. nuclear weapons – two very different world views
September 29th, 2016 | 
Author: 
By Jan Oberg
Last night I had the opportunity to discuss nuclear weapons with an experienced, high-ranking security analyst who has been both a military, a scholar, an assistant secretary of defence, presidential adviser, a corporate man and now a think tank member, Lawrence J. Korb.
We were discussing the issues touched upon in this and this article.
I would assume that the debate – facilitated by Iran’s PressTV in an excellent manner – is illustrative of the degree to which the world can be seen from different perspectives and how different we can perceive words such as law, legality, ethics, security, deterrence and peace.
I assume also that the debate illustrates the difference between a systems-embedded interpretation of the world and an independent or free perception, including what can and must be changed and what doesn’t have to change to make the world a better place.
Enjoy!
Posted in Abolition, Armament, Cold War - new, Future perspectives, General issues, Human rights and justice, International law, Jan Oberg, Military - technology, NATO, Nuclear weapons, Pro-peace & proposals, Psychology - war & peace, Russia, Security and defence, Terrorism, US Empire, Videos, Violence-prevention, World order/governance